Artificial intelligence promises to liberate humanity from tedious tasks. But for translators, it creates more tedious tasks than challenging creative work.
This is the hidden story behind Machine Translation Post-Editing (MTPE).
MTPE looks efficient on the surface. In practice, it erodes professional identity. It creates an existential crisis disguised as technological progress.
What is MTPE?
Machine Translation Post-Editing (MTPE) is the process of reviewing and correcting the output of a machine translation system. It is often divided into:
- Light post-editing: You just fix the obvious mistakes so the text makes sense. It’s quick and simple.
- Full post-editing: You fix all the mistakes, make sentences sound nice, and make sure it’s correct for the culture and context. It’s like rewriting the text so it’s really good.
When “Editing” Feels Like Betrayal
MTPE is a great illusion of the translation industry.
Imagine accepting an MTPE job thinking you’ll tidy up a machine’s output. Hours later, you’re knee-deep in incoherent sentences, cultural misfires, and mistranslated idioms. You’ve essentially retranslated the content—but at half the pay.
This is the quiet tension in modern translation work: MTPE is sold as simple “post-editing,” but in reality, it often demands the precision, creativity, and effort of a full translation. Meanwhile, translators feed AI systems that everyone other than the translators profit from, often underpaid for their labor.
So, is it fair that MTPE rates are lower than translation rates? Let’s break it down.
Why MTPE Rates Stay Low (and Why That’s a Problem)
Agencies sell MTPE as “faster, simpler.” The logic seems straightforward: a machine has done half the work, so humans should finish quickly—and get paid less. Reality disagrees.
Translators don’t just touch machine output for speed. Every correction trains AI systems—essentially providing free labor that benefits everyone else but you. Shouldn’t that reshape how we value the work?
Why rates stay compressed:
- Efficiency illusion: Machine output looks like a head start, but fixing it often takes just as long.
- Client budgets: Cost savings are demanded, and agencies pass the squeeze down the chain.
- Contract framing: Label it “editing” instead of “translation,” and suddenly discounted rates feel justified.
The Reality of MTPE Work
Doing MTPE doesn’t give translators much reward.
- Mentally: It’s boring and doesn’t help you grow smarter.
- Creatively: You don’t get better at writing or translating.
- Financially: The pay is usually low.
It’s mostly built to help AI systems, not the translators.
What looks like “just fix a few sentences” often turns into rewriting the whole thing. The computer makes mistakes with meaning, sayings, and culture. So your brain keeps jumping between fixing and rewriting—it’s tiring.
And emotionally? It wears you out. You keep fixing broken words and meanings, but at the end, you feel burned out, not stronger.
The Identity Crisis for Translators
Human expertise is being devalued. What once was mastery is now repackaged and sold at bargain prices.
Translation, one of humanity’s oldest crafts, is at the center of this shift. Machines produce rough text. Humans are asked to fix it. On the surface, this looks like progress. In reality, it’s the quiet erasure of a profession.
The Trap of Adaptation
Many translators think MTPE is adapting to the future. But it’s not adaptation—it’s reduction. Your craft is reframed as cleanup. Your expertise is downgraded to correction.
The Real Question
This isn’t just about rates. It’s about identity.
What does it mean to be a translator when your role is defined by what a machine cannot do, instead of what only you can do?
A Different Path
Adapting doesn’t mean accepting less. It means finding ways to use technology without letting it define you. Translators bring meaning, nuance, and humanity to language—machines can’t do that.
The question isn’t whether machines will translate.
The question is whether translators will still choose to create meaning.
The Doers vs. The Directors
Every industry reaches a turning point. When change arrives, two paths open.
- The Doers:
They take the path of least resistance.
They accept the market’s terms. They edit machine output because “that’s where the work is going.” They focus on survival, not significance.
The Directors ask: What should I create, reshape, or reinvent so that the work serves me—and not the other way around? - The Directors:
They choose differently. They see tools as servants, not masters.
They know that value is not dictated—it is defended. Their questions cut deeper: What does this mean for my craft? Does this align with my long-term vision? Am I building meaning, or am I just staying busy as a cog in someone else’s system?
The Doers ask: How quickly can I adapt to what’s being offered?
Don’t just adapt. Redesign. Don’t just accept. Reimagine. The choice is simple but not easy.
Will you be a Doer, or will you step into the role of Director?
The Hidden Architecture of Exploitation
MTPE isn’t just underpriced. It’s a quiet redefinition of what your work means.
When you accept “editing” rates for translation, you aren’t only giving up income. You’re allowing your craft to be reframed—as if your years of expertise matter less because a machine took a first pass.
This is the hidden violence of technological progress. It doesn’t erase your job. It erodes your worth.
The deeper costs
- Your corrections strengthen systems that profit everyone but you.
- Your role shifts from creator to custodian.
- Your identity moves from craftsperson to quality checker.
The cost is twofold: immediate in your wallet, permanent in your sense of self.
Don’t let someone else decide what your expertise is worth. Technology should expand your role, not shrink it. Recognize the difference between work that builds meaning and work that merely moves numbers. Seek projects that honor your insight. Guard your craft. Let technology amplify your capacity, not redefine it.
The future of translation isn’t just about pay—it’s about protecting meaning, craft, and dignity.
Principles for Professional Sovereignty
Principle 1. Value Is Demonstrated, Not Negotiated
Your expertise doesn’t become less valuable because a machine attempted the work first. Price accordingly. Price it for what it’s truly worth.
Principle 2. Identity Precedes Strategy
Before accepting any MTPE project, ask: “Does this align with who I’m becoming as a professional?” Strategy without identity is just busy work dressed up as progress.
Principle 3. Sustainable Rebellion
Saying no to exploitative work isn’t defiance—it’s professional hygiene. You’re not rejecting progress; you’re rejecting the degradation of your craft.
Saying no to exploitative work is not defiance; it is preservation. It is professional hygiene. Guard your skill, your creativity, your place in the profession.
Principle 4. Create Alternative Futures
Don’t just resist poor MTPE rates. Don’t only say no—demonstrate yes. Build models that show the world what meaningful translation looks like. Show clients the difference between utility-driven editing and work that carries depth, insight, and lasting impact.
The Longer Game
The MTPE debate isn’t just about rates. It mirrors our times. We are negotiating the terms under which human expertise will survive technology.
This goes beyond translation. Every professional faces the same question: will your skills be elevated by tools, or diminished into commodities?
The translators who understand this distinction won’t just survive the AI transition—they’ll define what professional meaning looks like in the age of artificial intelligence.
The Choice
Every MTPE project you accept or decline is a vote for the future of your profession.
You’re either building a world where human expertise is valued for its irreplaceable qualities—cultural intelligence, contextual understanding, creative problem-solving—or you’re building a world where humans become quality controllers for machine output.
The choice is simple. The execution takes courage.
The Deeper Work: Professional identity isn’t built by adaptation alone. It is built through deliberate choices about which work deserves your focus. The new tools should amplify your vision as a translator, not shrink your worth.
The future belongs to those who understand the difference. Those who claim their craft, rather than follow the default path.
Why MTPE Deserves Higher Pay
Translators bring immense value to MTPE projects—often far beyond what current rates reflect.
Consider this: every correction you make trains AI systems. Agencies and tech companies capture that benefit. You’re essentially providing free training, enhancing tools that profit everyone else—except you.
The skill required hasn’t diminished. Understanding nuance, context, and subject matter expertise is just as critical as in traditional translation. A machine’s first draft doesn’t reduce your responsibility, creativity, or judgment.
And the workload? Often, full retranslation is necessary. The effort can equal or surpass standard translation, yet pay remains artificially low.
The principle is clear: MTPE demands professional skill, judgment, and effort. Compensation should reflect that—not outdated assumptions about “machine-assisted work.”
When Translators Should Say No to MTPE
Saying no isn’t refusal—it’s protection. Sometimes, declining a project is essential for your craft, your standards, and your wellbeing.
Consider refusing when:
- Machine output is incoherent. If terminology, context, or grammar is fundamentally wrong, you’re not editing—you’re translating from scratch.
- Rates fall far below standard translation fees. Your expertise doesn’t lose value because a machine had a first attempt.
- The task effectively requires full retranslation while being paid as “editing.” That’s a misalignment between work and compensation.
- Projects consistently drain your energy and satisfaction. Long-term sustainability depends on protecting your passion for quality.
Alternatives to Underpaid MTPE
Exploitative MTPE rates aren’t inevitable. Translators have options beyond simply accepting unfair terms.
Consider these strategies:
- Educate and negotiate. Explain the real effort required for a project and request fair compensation. Often, agencies operate on outdated assumptions, not malice.
- Charge standard rates when needed. If machine output is unusable, you’re effectively performing full translation. Your pricing should reflect that reality.
- Advocate for industry reform. Collaborate with peers, associations, and forums to establish standards that recognize actual work requirements.
- Use MT as a personal tool. When you control the process and timeline, machine translation enhances efficiency without devaluing your labor.
Claim Your Craft, Shape the Future
The future belongs to those who see translation not as a transactional task, but as a meaningful practice. Claim it intentionally. Lead with courage. Let your expertise remain irreplaceable.
The solution is twofold:
Refuse exploitation, demand fairness. Don’t accept MTPE projects at discounted rates. Technology is here to stay, and early adoption is smart—but never at the cost of devaluing your craft. Fair pay is non-negotiable.
Harness AI for yourself, not for others. Use tools to do more, better, faster—but don’t feed corporate workflows for free. Your skill, amplified by AI, should expand your impact, not subsidize someone else’s profits.
Translation is human work. Meaning, nuance, and insight cannot be outsourced. Protect it. Own it. Lead with it.
Want to get practical tips, insights, and highlights from Translators’ Journal delivered to your inbox each week? Subscribe to our free newsletter, Journaled.
